Ask what your buyers ask.
Real questions, every AI engine, sampled several times a day. See who gets named and who gets linked.
who's winning right now?Plugd tracks what ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini say about you, fixes your site from your coding agent, and proves the lift.
| Buyer question | Pos. | Trend |
|---|
| Source | Type | Cites rivals | Cites you | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| reddit.com/r/SaaS | Forum | 31 | 2 | |
| g2.com/web-analytics | Reviews | 18 | 0 | |
| youtube.com/@saasdaily | Video | 12 | 0 | |
| tallyhq.com/vs/metricor | Competitor | 9 | — | |
| acme.com/compare | Yours | — | 9 |
Tracks every answer engine your buyers ask
They ask an AI, read one answer, and pick from the names in it. See all the numbers →
How often Google users click a regular result when an AI summary appears, versus when it doesn't. Only 1% click a link inside the summary.
Pew Research, July 2025 · sourceGrowth in AI-assistant traffic to US retail sites in Q1 2026, and those visitors converted 42% better than other traffic.
Adobe Digital Insights, Apr 2026 · sourceof B2B software buyers now start their research in an AI chatbot more often than in Google.
G2, 2026 · n=1,076 · sourcePlugd shows you what AI says about your brand (every engine, every day) plugs into Claude Code or Cursor to fix your site (in your own repo) then checks again until you're the answer. (proof, not promises)
Real questions, every AI engine, sampled several times a day. See who gets named and who gets linked.
who's winning right now?Plugd hands Claude Code or Cursor a ranked fix plan. It edits your repo and opens a PR you review.
no agency retainerEvery fix gets a baseline and an automatic re-check, so you know what actually worked.
receipts, not vibesAgencies charge for tracking, audits and on-site fixes. That's the part software does best.
One line to connect Claude Code, Codex, Cursor or OpenCode. Then ask in plain words, and it tracks, fixes and re-checks.
Pay for checks, not seats. Every plan includes MCP, CLI and API access, and unlimited teammates.
One product that wants to show up.
For teams shipping fixes every week.
For agencies and bigger teams.
| Indie | Pro | Custom | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRACKING | |||
| Sites | 1 | 3 | Any |
| Buyer questions | 30 | 150 | Custom |
| Check frequency | Weekly | Twice a week | Daily |
| Runs per question | 3 | 3 | 5+ |
| ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity | |||
| Google AI Overviews, Copilot, Grok | — | ||
| Real-interface capture | — | ||
| FIX & PROVE | |||
| Site audit + fix plan | |||
| MCP for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode | |||
| GitHub fix PRs | — | ||
| Before / after lift per fix | |||
| Citations & competitors | — | ||
| TEAM & REPORTING | |||
| Teammates | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Alerts | Email + Slack | Email + Slack | |
| White-label reports & client workspaces | — | — | |
No, and be wary of anyone who does. AI answers change from run to run. We show where you stand, what to change, and whether the change worked.
API answers often differ from what people see in the app, so Cloud captures the real ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google interfaces and samples every question several times. Each data point says how it was collected.
Never. We draft outreach to the pages AI already trusts, and a human sends it. No fake accounts, reviews or spam pages.
The fix loop works best with Claude Code or Cursor. Without one, you still get the dashboard, the fix plan and ready-to-paste changes.